Get Instant Access of 100% Real SAP C-DBADM-2601 Exam Questions with Verified Answers [Q104-Q120]

Rate this post

Get Instant Access of 100% Real SAP C-DBADM-2601 Exam Questions with Verified Answers

Exam Dumps for the Preparation of Latest C-DBADM-2601 Exam Questions

SAP C-DBADM-2601 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Section	Weight	Objectives
Monitoring and Troubleshooting	11% – 20%	– Performance analysis and optimization – Monitoring tools and metrics – Problem diagnosis and resolution
Migration and Integration	11% – 20%	– Integration with SAP systems – Data movement and replication – Migration to SAP HANA Cloud
Database Security	11% – 20%	– Audit and compliance – Security settings and encryption – Data protection and access control
SAP HANA Architecture and Deployment	11% – 20%	– Architecture components and concepts – Installation and upgrade procedures – Deployment options: on-premise and cloud
Backup and Recovery	11% – 20%	– Backup strategies and execution – High availability and disaster recovery – Recovery procedures and scenarios
Database Administration and Configuration	11% – 20%	– User and authorization management – Resource management and allocation – System configuration and parameters

Q104. A regional equipment leasing company uses SAP HANA for contract analytics. The administrator performs a recovery rehearsal in a validation environment. The restore completes, but the validation notes show that the backup set was selected manually from an older catalog entry rather than from the recovery point required by the operations policy. The recovered database opens successfully, and the business analyst confirms that sample reports can run.
The constraint is that the administrator must prove recovery readiness for the required point, not merely demonstrate that some backup can be restored. The rehearsal result will be used to approve the next backup policy review.
Which action best corrects the recovery validation?

Accept the rehearsal because the database opened successfully and reports can run after restore.

Identify the backup chain for the required recovery point, rerun the restore from that chain, and validate the recovered state.

Create a new manual backup and use it as the recovery baseline for the backup policy review.

Repeat the same restore and add more sample report checks to prove the recovered database is usable.

Q105. A regional public library network runs SAP HANA for membership and circulation analytics. After a planned stop and start activity, SAP HANA cockpit shows the database as available, and manual checks succeed. However, the post-start validation checklist shows that one scheduled administration task remains inactive because it was not re-enabled after the maintenance window. The operations coordinator proposes closing the activity because users can already access reports.
The constraint is that the administrator must confirm that routine administration resumes after startup, not only that interactive access works. The next administration cycle must execute without relying on manual intervention.
What should the administrator do before closing the activity?

Close the activity because successful manual checks prove the database is available for normal use.

Restart the database again so inactive scheduled administration tasks are automatically re-enabled.

Replace the scheduled task with a manual checklist for the next administration cycle.

Re-enable the scheduled administration task, verify its execution state, and validate the next planned run condition.

Q106. A regional utilities billing provider uses SAP HANA for meter usage analytics in an on-premises administration environment. After a planned stop and start sequence, SAP HANA cockpit shows the database as available. During post-start validation, the administrator finds that a scheduled health-check job did not run because its execution window still references the pre-maintenance calendar setting. Manual checks succeed, and the support team wants to close the activity because user dashboards are accessible.
The constraint is that the administrator must confirm routine post-start administration is restored before closure. The validation must prove scheduled execution readiness, not only manual access or database availability.
Which action best resolves the post-start validation gap?

Close the activity because SAP HANA cockpit availability and successful manual checks prove operational readiness.

Restart the database again so the scheduled health-check job can inherit the current maintenance calendar automatically.

Correct the scheduled job execution window, run or validate the next planned health-check execution, and record the result.

Replace the scheduled health check with an on-demand manual check for the next reporting cycle.

Q107. CHALLENGE 2 – Traceability Workload Monitoring Baseline
Late-shift lot-history aggregation shows variable response time during rollout testing. The plant operations manager asks for tuning before the next checkpoint, but the current monitoring baseline has not yet been captured. What should the database owner do first?

Apply tuning immediately because late-shift reporting volume is business critical.

Capture the monitoring baseline and validate threshold relevance before approving tuning.

Disable late-shift monitoring so the next checkpoint focuses only on report completion.

Move the tuning decision to SAP HANA Cloud because analytics modernization is planned.

Q108. CHALLENGE 3 – Reporting Performance Evidence Control
The database owner wants performance improvements recorded as part of hypercare success, while the operations lead wants stabilization evidence preserved before tuning. Which decision best balances performance and evidence quality?

Apply tuning and record the improved response time as the main hypercare result.

Preserve current monitoring evidence, validate thresholds, then document any tuning as a controlled follow-on change.

Reject all performance changes until the SAP HANA Cloud transition is complete.

Use the cloud reporting test results to replace the on-premises hypercare performance record.

Q109. CHALLENGE 3 – Cloud Planning Evidence Separation
The modernization lead wants the SAP HANA Cloud database included in the same readiness status because it is provisioned and has a limited patient-flow dataset. The cloud environment has not completed the startup, monitoring, or recovery evidence package used for current readiness systems. What is the best response?

Include the cloud database in the same status because provisioning and sample data show progress.

Keep cloud planning evidence separate until cloud-specific administration validation is completed.

Use the upgraded reporting system’s monitoring record as the SAP HANA Cloud readiness record.

Stop cloud planning until the current recovery readiness decision is fully completed.

Q110. A regional industrial services firm completes an SAP HANA installation rehearsal for a new on-premises administration environment. The database starts successfully, and SAP HANA cockpit shows it as available. During validation, the administrator notices that the installation checklist confirms database startup but does not include verification that the administrative backup destination and monitoring collection were bound to the new system. The handover owner wants to accept the system because the installation log shows no error.
The constraint is that the administrator must confirm the installed database is administratively operable before handover. The decision must include evidence for routine controls, not only the installation log and startup state.
Which action best supports accepting the installation rehearsal?

Accept the rehearsal because the installation log has no error and the database starts successfully.

Create a handover note stating that backup and monitoring controls will be verified after the first workload run.

Restart the database and accept the handover if SAP HANA cockpit still shows the system as available.

Bind and validate the backup destination and monitoring collection for the new system before accepting handover.

Q111. CHALLENGE 4 – Release Recoverability Evidence Gate
The release lead can approve UAT sign-off on schedule using backup completion evidence, or delay briefly to include recovery validation for the UAT database and recoverability evidence for the upgraded system. Which path is most defensible?

Approve on schedule because meeting the release decision date is the strongest governance outcome.

Delay briefly to complete recoverability evidence for systems supporting the release package.

Approve on schedule and attach recovery validation to the future SAP HANA Cloud migration plan.

Cancel the release decision because recovery validation was not completed before UAT began.

Q112. A regional rail services company uses SAP HANA for maintenance planning analytics. The administrator reviews recovery readiness after a backup configuration update. SAP HANA cockpit shows a recent successful data backup, and log backups are being created. During validation, the recovery checklist shows that the log backup location recorded for restore operations differs from the active log backup destination now used by the system. The operations team suggests approving readiness because both data and log backups exist.
The constraint is that the administrator must prove that restore procedures reference the active backup locations before accepting recovery readiness. The team must avoid a situation where backups exist but the documented recovery path cannot retrieve them.
What should the administrator do next?

Approve recovery readiness because the system has recent data and log backup artifacts.

Update and validate the recovery checklist against the active log backup destination, then rerun restore-path validation.

Disable log backup creation until the documented restore location and active destination match again.

Create another data backup and use its catalog entry as the primary recovery evidence.

Q113. A food distribution company uses SAP HANA for warehouse performance reporting. The administrator performs a scheduled recovery test in a non-production validation environment using the latest available backup set. The restore starts successfully, but validation shows that the recovered database does not include the expected transactions from the final hour before the backup window closed. The backup monitor shows successful data backup completion and a later log backup entry marked as delayed.
The constraint is that the administrator must validate the agreed recovery point before the backup process is accepted. The team cannot treat a successful restore start as sufficient evidence of recovery readiness.
What should the administrator do next?

Accept the recovery test because the restore process started successfully from a valid backup set.

Repeat the restore using the same backup set and skip the transaction-level validation step.

Investigate the delayed log backup dependency, make the required log sequence available, and rerun recovery validation for the target point.

Create a new data backup after the test and use that completion result as proof that the previous recovery point was valid.

Q114. A regional insurance provider completes an SAP HANA installation activity for a new administrative test environment. The installation summary reports success, and the database can be started. During the post-installation validation, SAP HANA cockpit shows the system, but one required administrative check remains incomplete because the database explorer connection was not created for the new database. The infrastructure team wants to mark the installation complete because the database process is running.
The constraint is that the administrator must confirm that the installation is operationally usable for administration tasks, not merely installed and started. The environment must be handed over with validated administration access.
Which action should the administrator take before handover?

Close the installation because the installation summary reports success and the database can be started.

Create and verify the database explorer connection for the new database, then complete the post-installation validation.

Restart the database so SAP HANA cockpit and database explorer can automatically align their connection states.

Postpone validation until the first scheduled backup proves the new database is operationally available.

Q115. CHALLENGE 2 – Dispatch Simulation Monitoring Baseline
The monitoring dashboard shows acceptable business-hour availability, but carrier exception behavior varies overnight. The thresholds may still reflect the pre-cutover reporting profile. Which action best supports a reliable cutover conclusion?

Confirm threshold relevance for the overnight dispatch workload before interpreting the dashboard trend.

Increase all thresholds so the final readiness review avoids unnecessary performance warnings.

Treat business-hour availability as sufficient because the database remained reachable.

Tune the overnight workload first and update monitoring evidence after the release decision.

Q116. A marine logistics company is planning a phased move from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. In the first rehearsal, the source export completes and the SAP HANA Cloud target is reachable. During post-transfer checks, the administrator notices that the validation workbook records transfer completion but has no evidence that monitoring and backup administration were reviewed for the cloud target after import. The project lead wants to approve the phase because the data movement finished.
The constraint is that the administrator must support incremental modernization while confirming that the target can be administered after migration. Approval must be based on transfer success plus operational readiness evidence.
What should the administrator recommend before approving the migration phase?

Approve the phase because source export completion and target reachability prove the migration path works.

Repeat only the source export so the data movement result is confirmed before the production window.

Defer monitoring and backup administration review until after production cutover to keep the phased plan on schedule.

Add target-side monitoring and backup administration validation to the rehearsal evidence, then approve only after those checks pass.

Q117. CHALLENGE 4 – Regional Release Recovery Assurance
Backups completed for the upgraded central SAP HANA system and the newly installed remediation database before testing began. Recovery validation for the remediation database is scheduled but not complete, and the upgraded system has only backup completion evidence. What should happen before regional release approval?

Approve the release because completed backups are enough for retail reporting continuity.

Complete recovery validation and document startup behavior for the remediation systems.

Release the template and perform recovery validation only if reporting becomes unavailable.

Replace recovery validation with dashboard availability because this is not a production outage.

Q118. An engineering services company completes a controlled configuration change for SAP HANA administration parameters in an on-premises database. After the change, the database is running, but the administrator notices that the expected configuration value is visible in the planned change record while the active runtime view still shows the previous value. Routine checks continue to succeed, so the application coordinator asks to close the change.
The constraint is that the administrator must confirm that the intended configuration is actually active before completing the operational handover. The environment uses mixed administrative tooling, and the change record alone cannot be treated as execution evidence.
Which action should the administrator take?

Close the change because routine checks are succeeding and the planned change record shows the intended value.

Update the change documentation to match the active runtime value and avoid further administrative action.

Determine why the configured value is not active, apply the required activation step, and validate the runtime value again.

Restart monitoring so the active runtime view can refresh without changing the database configuration state.

Q119. A consumer lending firm runs an on-premises SAP HANA database for core transaction support and uses SAP HANA Cloud for selected analytical workloads. During the morning review, administrators see that the database remains available and background jobs finished, but one monitoring dashboard now shows repeated alert bursts for a short interval after each monitoring cycle.
The alert pattern clears on its own and does not affect general user processing. A team member recommends disabling the noisy alert because it looks self-correcting. The operations lead wants to keep monitoring reliable without hiding a genuine issue, and the first action must stay within current operating scope.
What is the best first action?

Review whether the alert bursts are caused by a specific monitoring threshold or collection sequence before changing the alert design.

Disable the alert temporarily because self-clearing alerts do not represent a meaningful operational problem.

Restart the monitored database so the alert pattern can be cleared before the next review cycle begins.

Increase system capacity immediately because repeated alerts prove the current environment is under-sized.

Q120. CHALLENGE 2 – Replenishment Analytics Monitoring Baseline
Inventory availability analytics took longer during the evening replenishment review. The merchandising operations lead asks for tuning before the next remediation checkpoint, but current monitoring thresholds still reflect earlier regional reporting patterns. What should the database owner do first?

Apply tuning immediately because replenishment reporting affects store planning decisions.

Move the tuning decision to SAP HANA Cloud because the reporting workload may migrate later.

Validate threshold relevance and capture the current monitoring baseline before approving tuning.

Disable evening monitoring so the next checkpoint focuses only on whether reports complete.