[Q60-Q81] Latest HP HPE6-A45 First Attempt, Exam real Dumps Updated [Nov-2023]

Rate this post

Latest HP HPE6-A45 First Attempt, Exam real Dumps Updated [Nov-2023]

Get the superior quality HPE6-A45 Dumps Questions from Test4Cram. Nobody can stop you from getting to your dreams now. Your bright future is just a click away!

NEW QUESTION 60
Refer to the exhibits.

Exhibit 2

The network administrator configures the commands shown in Exhibit 2. Which mismatch will cause an issue?

the mismatch between the key IDs specified in chain10 and chain11 on Switch-1

the mismatch between the key-strings in the chains for VLAN 10 and VLAN 11 on Switch-1

the mismatch between the chain names associated with VLAN 11 on Switch-1 and on Switch-3

the mismatch between the key-strings associated with VLAN 10 on Switch-1 and on Switch-2

NEW QUESTION 61
Refer to the exhibits.
Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Network administrators are alerted to high interface utilization on a switch by a management solution. They examine the utilization on the uplink interfaces several times an hour during problem times. The exhibit shows output typical of times of congestion. The administrators want to allocate bandwidth fairly and reduce congestion on the uplinks.
What could help meet these requirements?

a per-queue rate limit on interfaces 1 and 2

an outbound rate limit on each edge port

a broadcast rate limit on each edge port

an outbound rate limit on interfaces 1 and 2

NEW QUESTION 62
Refer to the exhibits.

The network administrator enters the commands shown in Exhibit 2, and Switch-1 and Switch-2 exchange keepalive messages. What is the expected behavior if Switch-1 later fails to receive keepalive messages from Switch-2?

Switch-1 disables interface 1 for 10 seconds, and then re-enables it. The same process repeats twice. If the issue persists, the switch disables the interface permanently.

After two consecutive missed keep-alive packets, Switch-1 disables interface 1, and the interface stays disabled until the issue is fixed.

After two consecutive missed keep-alive packets, Switch-1 sends SNMP traps, and Link 1 stays up until the issue is fixed.

Switch-1 disables interface 1 for 10 seconds and then re-enables it. The interface continues to be re-enabled and disabled every 10 seconds until the issue is fixed.

NEW QUESTION 63
What is one difference between BPDU protection and root guard?

BPDU protection works with RPVST+RSTP, and MSTP Root guard works with RSTP or MSTP, but not RPVST+.

BPDU protection blocks a port if it receives any BPDU, but root guard block a port only if the BPDU indicates a better root path.

BPDU protection is typically implemented on edge ports, but root guard is typically implemented on uplinks with the root port role.

BPDU protection drops BPDUs received on a port, but does not block the port. Root guard blocks the port if it receives a BPDU.

NEW QUESTION 64
Refer to the exhibit.

The access layer AOS-Switches currently run DHCP snooping on VLAN 2 and connection rate filtering on edge ports. They are at default settings for ARP protection. A network administrator then enters these commands on each of the access layer switches:
Switch(config)# arp-protect vlan 2 Switch(config)# arp-protect
Which behavior accurse?

The switches will forward legitimate traffic and prevent ARP poisoning attacks, but interfere with connection rate filtering.

The switches can now prevent ARP poisoning attacks and do not interfere with legitimate communications.

The switches can prevent ARP poisoning attacks, but legitimate communications with VLAN 2 could also be disrupted.

The switches will not apply ARP protection due to interference from DHCP snooping, so the commands have no effect on current behavior.

NEW QUESTION 65
A network administrator configures DHCP snooping on VLAN 2. How does the switch handle DHCP traffic that arrives in this VLAN on an untrusted interface?

It accepts packets from a DHCP server, but drops client packets.

It drops all DHCP traffic logs a security event.

It accepts both client and server packets as long as they match the DHCP binding table.

It accepts client packets, but drops packets from a DHCP server.

NEW QUESTION 66
The security policy for a company requires that switches use SNMPv3 and accept all read-only SNMPv2c messages. The network administrator enables SNMPv3. Which additional action should the network administrator take to comply with this policy?

Disabled SNMPv3 inform timeouts.

Enable SNMPv3 only operation.

Enable SNMPv3 restricted mode.

Disable SNMPv1/v2c.

NEW QUESTION 67
A network administrator can set the OSPF metric type on an AOS-Switch to Type 1 or Type 2. What is the difference?

A Type 2 metric marks external routes that can be advertised in NSSAs, while a Type 1 metric marks external routes that can only be advertised in normal areas.

A Type 2 metric assigns cost to a 100 Gbps link, while a Type 1 metric assigns cost 1 to all links of 100 Mbps or higher.

A Type 2 metric is assigned to multiple external routes that are aggregated together, while a Type 1 metric does not permit external route aggregation.

A Type 2 metric stays the same as the external route is advertised, while a Type 1 metric increments with internal OSPF link costs.

NEW QUESTION 68
Refer to the exhibit.

Why are these switches unable to achieve adjacency?

Switch-1 and Switch-2 use different area types for Area 1.

Switch-2 does not support every area that Switch-1 does.

The area range is incorrect on Switch-1 and missing on Switch-2.

They have the same priority and cannot elect a Designated Router (DR).

NEW QUESTION 69
Refer to the exhibits.
Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Switch-1 and Switch-2 are configured to provide VRRP in VLAN 2. The default gateway for VLAN 2 is set to the VRRP virtual IP. Client-1 in VLAN 2 cannot ping its default gateway.
Based on the exhibits, what can administrators determine?

The VRRP preempt delay time has not yet expired, and administrators should try to ping the gateway again in several minutes.

Switch-1 and Switch-2 have the same virtual router ID. The conflict interferes with connectivity.

Preempt mode is enabled on both Switch-1 and Switch-2, so the Master role continues to alternate between them, and the pings go astray.

This is the expected behavior, and Switch-1 should still be able to route traffic for Client-
1.

NEW QUESTION 70
An AOS-Switch needs to be configured to support tunneled node in role-based mode. The Mobility Controller administrators tell the switch administrators that the AOS-Switch will integrate with a cluster of Mobility Controllers. The Cluster virtual IP address is 10.1.1.10.
How should switch administrators integrate the AOS-Switch with the cluster?

Double-check the settings with the Mobility Controller administrators because the planned configuration is incompatible with the switch settings.

Configure the virtual IP address as the tunneled-node-server address: tunneled node will not, but the clustering features will not provide redundancy.

Configure the virtual IP address as the tunneled-node-server address: The switch will automatically learn controller IP addresses to which to tunnel various traffic.

Configure the virtual IP address for the primary tunneled-node-server and an actual controller IP address for the backup tunneled-node-server in order to receive redundancy.

NEW QUESTION 71
A network administrator plans to apply DSCP 46 to all traffic on a port. What is required for this configuration to work?

The port has trust set to default.

A DSCP map that sets 46 to a priority value.

The port has trust set to DSCP.

A QoS policy selects traffic with DSCP 46.

NEW QUESTION 72
Refer to the exhibits
Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Both Switch-1 and Switch-2 have an OSPF inter-area route to 10.2.0.0/16 with metric 10 in their IP routing table. Switch-3 has the default setting for ECMP. Based on the exhibits, what should the Switch-3 routing table display if the network operates as normal?

no route to 10.2.0.0/16

two routes to 10.2.0.0/16 through both 10.1.0.1 and 10.1.0.5

a route to 10.2.0.0/16 through 10.1.0.5

a route to 10.2.0.0/16 through 10.1.0.1

NEW QUESTION 73
Refer to the exhibits:
Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

A network administrator at a university notices high utilization on links between the access layer and core. The output shown in the exhibit is characteristic of samples taken several times an hour during congestion. The administrator suspects file sharing and other unauthorized traffic, and decides to use an ACL to permit only HTTP, HTTPS, and a few other authorized types of traffic.
How can the administrator apply the ACL to address both the security and the congestion problem?

as an inbound PACL on the link aggregations on the access switches

as an inbound VACL on the student VLAN on Switch-1

as an inbound PACL on the link aggregations on Switch-1

as an inbound VACL on the student VLAN on the access switches

NEW QUESTION 74
Refer to the exhibit.
Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Traffic between the servers in Area 1 takes a less optimal path rather than the link associated with VLAN
1000, subnet 10.0.0.0/30. Based on the exhibits, why is this the case?

The metric on the VLAN 1000 interface is too low.

Switch-1 and Switch-2 cannot achieve adjacency on VLAN 1000 due to mismatches.

OSPF routing switches choose the best intra-area routes based on Area 1 links only.

The link between Switch-1 and Switch-2 has gone down.

NEW QUESTION 75
Refer to the exhibits.
Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

The network administrator needs to set up BGP between the two company switches, Switch-1 and Switch-2. The BGP connection does not establish. Based on the exhibits, what does the administrator need to do to fix the issue?

Set the update source for the neighbor to the local loopback interface on each switch.

Enter the network command for 10.0.0.0/24 in the router BGP mode on each switch.

Enable the multihop option for the neighbor on each of the switches.

Enable BGP on the interfaces that the switches use to reach each other.

NEW QUESTION 76
Refer to the exhibits.
Exhibit 1

Exhibit 2

Exhibit 2 shows IGMP groups on Switch-2, which runs IGMP but not PIM. Switch-1 and Switch-3 do not have IGMP or PIM enabled. Client 1 begins to forward multicasts to 239.1.1.1.
Which clients receive the multicasts?

Client 3, but not any of the other clients

Client 2, but not any of the other clients

Client 3 and Client 4, but not Client 2

Client 2, Client 3, and Client 4

NEW QUESTION 77
What is the minimum requirement for a device to pass local MAC authentication (LMA) on an AOS-Switch?

The device MAC address matches a default MAC group, which is enabled but not necessarily associated with a profile.

The device MAC address matches a MAC group, address, OUI, or range that is associated with an LMA profile.

The device MAC address matches a default MAC group that is associated with an LMA profile.

The device MAC address matches a configured MAC group, address, OUI, or range, which is not necessarily associated with a profile.

NEW QUESTION 78
AOS-Switch runs IGMP in data-driven mode. What behavior does it exhibit?

It drops multicasts destined to groups that have no members

It preempts the querier role even if another device has higher priority

It floods multicasts on all ports in the VLAN if the group has at least one member

It disables automatic fast leave on ports that connect to a single device

NEW QUESTION 79
Refer to the exhibit.

Switch-1 is an AOS-switch that is operating at factory default settings for QoS and has type of service disabled. It receives a frame with 802.1p value 5 on trk1, on VLAN 2. How does the switch treat the frame when it forwards it on TRK2?

It forwards it with higher than normal priority and 802.1p 0.

It forwards it with normal priority and 802.1p 0.

It forwards it with normal priority and 802.1p 5

It forwards it with higher than normal priority and 802.1p 5.

NEW QUESTION 80
OSPF Area 1 has two ABRs. One ABR is configured with this range for Area 1: 10.10.0.0/16. The other ABR is configured with this range for Area 1: 10.10.0.0/17.
Which type of issue occurs due to this mismatch?

The ABRs lose adjacency entirely and cannot route traffic between each other at all.

The ABRs create a discontiguous area and disrupt intra-area routing between devices within Area 1.

The ABRs advertise routes inconsistently, and they could potentially introduce a routing loop.

The ABRs lose adjacency in Area 1 and must route all traffic to each other through Area 0.

NEW QUESTION 81
Exhibit

Exhibit 1 shows a portion of the BGP routing table when the BGP solution was first deployed. Exhibit 2 shows the same portion at the current time. What can explain the current state?