Free Feb-2025 300-510 Dumps are Available for Instant Access [Q79-Q101]

Rate this post

Free Feb-2025 300-510 Dumps are Available for Instant Access

View All 300-510 Actual Exam Questions Answers and Explanations for Free

To earn the Cisco 300-510 certification, candidates must pass the 90-minute exam, which consists of 60-70 questions. 300-510 exam is available in English and Japanese and can be taken at Pearson VUE testing centers worldwide. Implementing Cisco Service Provider Advanced Routing Solutions certification is valid for three years, after which candidates must recertify by passing a qualifying exam or earning continuing education credits. The Cisco 300-510 certification is highly valued in the industry and can lead to career advancement opportunities and higher salaries.

NO.79

Refer to the exhibit. Users connected to an application on 1.1.1.1 via routers CE1 and CE2 are complaining of frequent disconnections. While troubleshooting the issue, a network engineer with an employee ID: 4333:96:
916 determined that the application itself is working normally, but the link connected to the 1.1.1.1 application is flapping. The users on CE1 and CE2 are accessing applications on 2.2.2.2 without difficulty.
Which action resolves the issue?

Disable split horizon on router R2.

Redistribute CE1 routes on router R2.

Enable passive interface on the router R3 Loopback1 interface.

Enable route dampening on routers R1 and R2

NO.80 Refer to the exhibit.

A network operator is getting the route for 10.11.11 0/24 from two upstream providers on
#XR3. The network operator must configure #XR3 to force the 10.11.11.0/24 prefix to route via next hop of 10.0.0.9 as primary when available. Which of these can the operator use the routing policy language for, to enforce this traffic forwarding path?

weight of 0 on the prefix coming from 192.168.0.2

lower local preference on the prefix coming from 192.168.0.2

higher local preference on the prefix coming from 192.168.0.1

weight of 100 on the prefix coming from 192.168.0.1

NO.81 Refer to the exhibit.

A network engineer configured routers R1 and R5 to run in IS-IS Level 1 mode and router R6 to run in IS-IS Level 2 mode. All other routers are running as Level 1 / Level 2 routers. An engineer expects traffic from R1 to R6 to pass via R2, but IS-IS routing has calculated the best path via R4. Which action corrects the problem?

Configure all routers as Level 1 routers.

Remove the link metric for the link from router R1 to router R2.

Change the link metric for the link from router R1 to router R2 to 1.

Configure all routers as Level 1 / Level 2 routers.

NO.82 Refer to the exhibit. After these configurations were applied to routers R1 and R2. the two devices cannot form a neighbor relationship What is the reason tor the problem?

The two routers have the same area ID.

The two routers have different iS-types

The two routers have the same network ID

The two routers cannot authenticate with one another

NO.83 Refer to the exhibit. A network operator wants to expand the segment routing global block in upcoming maintenance.
The operator must ensure that the changes to the segment routing global block have no adverse impacts on the prefix-sid associated with the loopback0 interface used within the OSPF domain.
Which command can the operator use to enforce R2 to have a strict prefix-sid assignment to loopback0?

NO.84

Refer to the exhibit. Users at the branch office on R1 reported issue with an application at the home office on R4. While troubleshooting the issue, a network engineer determined that
* The branch-office users can connect to the home office.
* The IS-IS adjacencies between R1 and R2 and R1 and the branch office are up.
* Traffic from R1 to the R2 10.20.1.0/24 network is moving normally.
* The application at the home office is experiencing packet drops on the connection to the Branch, and R3 cannot reach the R1 172.16.10.0/24 network.
Which action resolves the issues?

Redistribute static connected routes in IS-IS on router RI.

Configure the IS-IS core instance on the RI GigabitEthernet0/3 interface.

Redistribute static connected routes in IS-IS on router R4.

Configure the IS-IS core instance on the R2 GigabitEthernet0/1 interface.

NO.85

Refer to the exhibit. The service provider operations team was alerted that hub site traffic from BGP AS
65101 to AS 65201 uses a non-primary path via the R5-R6 link. IBGP peering between R1 and R2 is up. and no fiber failure has been reported on the R2-R3 link The team determined that the traffic flow between
10.10.10.1 and 192.168.30.1 is not considering the R1-R2-R3-R4 path. Which action resolves this issue?

Change the metric attribute to 20 with neighbor 10.10.10.5 on R1.

Change the local-preference attribute to 50 with neighbor 10.10 10 5 on R1

Set the local-preference to the default value with BGP neighbor 10 10.10.3 on R2 for receiving routes.

Add metric 5 with BGP neighbor 10.10.10.6 on R5for receiving routes.

NO.86 Refer to the exhibit. Company X is multihomed to a service provider. With the default settings, the link between PE2 and CE1 is the primary link, but company X has asked for the link between PE4 and CE2 to operate as the primary instead. A network engineer used a route map with local- preference to manipulate the routes from PE2 to CE1 to be less desirable and applied the route map on PE2 outbound to CE1. However, the path from PE2 to CE1 is still preferred.
Which action must the engineer take so that the desired path is chosen?

Apply local-preference on PE2 outbound to CE2 with a value less than 100.

Configure the AS path prepend attribute to increase the number of hops between CE2 and PE4.

Configure the weight attribute on PE2 in the outbound direction to CE2 with a value less than
65535.

Apply MED in the outbound direction on PE2 to CE1 with a cost lower than the path from PE4 to CE2.

NO.87

Refer to the exhibit There is a BGP traffic path issue between Customer-1 and Customer-2 Users from Customer-2 have reported file transfer issues High utilization on the path between both customers causes many packet drops. Which configuration resolves the issue?

Option A

Option B

Option C

Option D

NO.88 Refer to the exhibit. An engineer has configured all routers in the environment to run IS-IS Level 1 and Level 2 routing. The engineer wants traffic from R1 to R5 to pass via R2. but IS-IS routing has calculated the best path via R4. Which action corrects the problem?

Configure routers R1, R4, and R5 for Level 2 routing only.

Set the link metric for the link from router R1 to router R4 to 30 or more.

Set the link metric on R2 for the links from router R2 to routers R3 and R4 to 30 or more.

Configure routers R1, R2, and R5 for Level 1 routing only.

NO.89 Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer is addressing an IS-IS design issue which is running within the topology. All links are running on FastEthernet, except the link between R5 and R4, which is Gigabit Ethernet. Which statement about the design is true?

R4 prefer to reach R5 using R1 as the next hop

All links have equal cost if the default metric is used

R5 prefers to use R4 as the next hop for all routes

R1 prefer to use R5 as the next hop to reach R4

NO.90 Refer to the exhibit. After you applied these configurations to routers R1 and R2, the two devices could not form a neighbor relationship.
Which reason for the problem is the most likely?

The two routers cannot authenticate with one another.

The two routers have the same area ID.

The two routers have the same network ID.

The two routers have different IS-types.

NO.91 Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer applied the summarization configuration on R1 for four networks (192.168.20.0/24 to 192.168.23.0/24) in area 1 and eight networks (192.168.32.0/24 to 192.168.39.0/24) in area 2 to stop the flooding of all the customer routes. While checking the routing table of R2, the engineer noticed that R1 is still sending only specific routes to R2. Which configuration should the engineer apply on R1 to summarize routes?

Option A

Option B

Option C

Option D

NO.92 Refer to the exhibit.

Router 1 is connected to router 2 on interface TenGigE0/1. Which interface provides the alternate path to 172.16.200.9/32 when the link between router 1 and router 2 goes down?

TenGigE0/1 interface provides the alternate path

A backup path must be statically installed

TenGigE0/2 interface provides the alternate path

A primary path must be manually installed

NO.93 Refer to the exhibit. Multicast traffic destined from T1 and T2 routers to RP routers works well. A network engineer observes problems with multicast traffic flows between Site-A and Site-B. Site- A users fail to receive multicast stream on Site-B via RPTV site, while Site-B users fail to receive multicast stream on Site-A via RPTZ site. Which action must be implemented to resolve the issues?

Establish MDSP peering with interface IP subnet.

Configure Site-A and Site-B in 10.80.148./24 subnet.

Allow the OSPF and MSDP packets on the firewall.

Configure direct OSPF peering between Site-A and Site-B.

NO.94 A network engineer is troubleshooting OSPF multiarea. Which Cisco IOS XR feature should the engineer use in order to streamline OSPF issue?

hierarchical CLI

routing process enabled by default on all interfaces

DR support for topology management

show lp ospf topology command

NO.95 What is used by SR-TE to steer traffic through the network?

shortest path calculated by IGP

dynamic rules

path policy

explicit maps

NO.96 Refer to the exhibit.

Refer to the exhibit. Multicast traffic destined from T1 and T2 routers to RP routers works well. A network engineer observes problems with multicast traffic flows between Site-A and Site-B. Site-A users fail to receive multicast stream on Site-B via RPTY site, while Site-B users fail to receive multicast stream on Site-Avia RPTZ site. Which action must be implemented to resolve the issues?

Establish MDSP peering with interface IP subnet.

Configure Site-A and Site-B in 10.80.14804

Allow the OSPF and MSDP packets on the firewall.

Configure direct OSPF peering between Site-A and Ste-B

NO.97 Refer to the exhibit.

P1 and PE3 Cisco IOS XR routers are directly connected and have this configuration applied. The BGP session is not coming up. Assume that there is no IP reachability problem and both routers can open tcp port 179 to each other. Which two actions fix the issue? (Choose two.)

Change MD5 to HMAC-SHA1-12

Change MD5 to HMAC-ESP

Change MD5 to SHA-1

Change MD5 to HMAC-MD5

Remove the send and accept lifetime under key 1

NO.98 After an engineer configures BGP in R1, it starts receiving this message
*Jun 29 13:30:50.122: %BGP-5-ADJCHANGE: neighbor 192.168.10.1 Down User reset Jun 29 13:30:52.341: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 192.168.10.1 2/6 (unacceptable hold time)
0 bytes
Which action makes the peering come back up again?

Make a soft reset to the peer.

Set up a minimum hold-down timer higher.

Set up a hello timer higher.

Set up a hold-down timer higher.

NO.99 Refer to the exhibit. CE1 is the gateway router into the provider network via PE1.
A network operator must inject a default route into OSPF area 0.
All devices inside area 0 must be able to reach PE1.
Which configuration achieves this goal?

NO.100 Refer to the exhibit. A network operator is working to deploy a Unified BGP design and allow it to be available only in selected markets and services in the future. The label allocation is not functioning as desired. Which action will fix the issue?

Remove the allocate-labels command.

Reconfigure the route-policy ALL_LABELS to match all after the drop.

Reconfigure the route-policy ALL_LABELS to pass.

Remove the route policy and only configure “allocate-label”.

NO.101

Refer to the exhibit While troubleshooting a networking issue an engineer identified a suboptimal communication issue on route reflector RR2 In the current environment
* Router A is a non-route-reflector client for RR1 and RR2
* Routers D and E are directly connected iBGP peers.
* Router F is not an iBGP peer of routers D and E
Which action resolves the issue?